What is a common misconception about UST removal?

The belief that UST removal is unnecessary if the tank is not leaking reflects a common misunderstanding. While it is true that a tank that is not currently leaking may seem safe, regulatory standards and risk management practices recognize that tanks can deteriorate over time, potentially leading to leaks in the future. Additionally, even if a tank is structurally sound, the presence of an underground storage tank can pose environmental risks and compliance issues that necessitate its removal.

Removing a UST is often considered essential for several reasons. First, there are regulatory compliance obligations that require decommissioning or removing tanks to mitigate environmental risks associated with potential leaks or soil contamination. Second, in certain situations, the mere presence of a UST on a property can affect property value, future development plans, and liabilities. Addressing these concerns proactively through the removal of tanks, regardless of their current condition, can prevent future complications or environmental damages.

Therefore, the misconception lies in the assumption that a non-leaking tank does not require action, potentially leading to a lack of necessary preventive measures and oversight.